<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    
    <channel>
    

<title>Comments for: &quot;Intelligent Design&#8230; phtttt.&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/intelligent-design-phtttt/</link>
    <description>Intelligent design is not science and does not belong in a biology class. Intelligent design cannot be proven or dis&#45;proven. True or not it is not science. Philosophy, yes. History, yes. Theology, of course. Science, no. There are no two, equal sides. There&#8217;s science and religion. We should be far removed from this sort of discussion by now. It&#8217;s been almost 150 years since Darwin published The Origin of Species. That&#8217;s a lot of progress to ignore. This discussion is ridiculous, I have no problem with intelligent design (I have lots of problems with creationism...) though I feel that it&#8217;s an attempt by otherwise rational people to explain evolution in biblical terms. I&#8217;ve already given this more time than it deserves. Phhttt.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>kifwalu@gmail.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2005</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2005-08-08T02:27:01-07:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
<!--
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<rdf:Description
    rdf:about="http://www.rhinocity.net/intelligent-design-phtttt/"
    trackback:ping="http://www.rhinocity.net/trackback/77/zyNLRZVE/"
    dc:title="Intelligent Design... phtttt."
    dc:identifier="http://www.rhinocity.net/77/" 
    dc:subject="Main"
    dc:description="&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Intelligent design is not science and does not belong in a biology class. &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Intelligent design cannot be proven or dis&#45;proven. &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;True or not it is not science. Philosophy, yes. History, yes. Theology, of course. Science, no.&amp;lt;!&#45;&#45;more&#45;&#45;&amp;gt; There are no two, equal sides. There&apos;s science and religion. We should be far removed from this sort of discussion by now. It&apos;s been almost 150 years since Darwin published The Origin of Species. That&apos;s a lot of progress to ignore. This discussion is ridiculous,&#8230;"
    dc:creator="Ryan"
    dc:date="2005-08-08 02:27:01 AM GMT" />
</rdf:RDF>
-->



</channel>
</rss>
