<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Rhinocity.net</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Atom Feed</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/feed/atom/" />
    <updated>2008-02-14T18:09:21Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2008, Ryan</rights>
    <generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.6.0">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2008:02:14</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Indiana Jones IV Trailer is OUT</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/indiana-jones-iv-trailer-is-out/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2008:/3.143</id>
      <published>2008-02-14T18:06:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-02-14T18:09:21Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>Awwwooooooooooooooohhhh!!! The Indy IV trailer is here!
</p>
<p>
See it. Now. Go!
</p>
<p>
<object width="400" height="327" id="uvp_fop"><param name="movie" value="http://l.yimg.com/cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/fop/embedflv/swf/fop.swf"></param><param name="flashVars" value="id=6441610&amp;rd=eyc-off&amp;ympsc=&amp;postpanelEnable=1&amp;prepanelEnable=1&amp;infopanelEnable=1&amp;carouselEnable=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed height="327" width="400" id="uvp_fop" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://l.yimg.com/cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/fop/embedflv/swf/fop.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="id=6441610&amp;rd=eyc-off&amp;ympsc=&amp;prepanelEnable=1&amp;infopanelEnable=1"></embed></object>
</p>
<p>
&#8220;You&#8217;re a&#8230; teacher?&#8221;
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Part time.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Exclamation Point!
</p>
 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/indiana+jones/" rel="tag">indiana jones</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/kindom+of+the+crystal+skull/" rel="tag">kindom of the crystal skull</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/trailer/" rel="tag">trailer</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Lego Indiana Jones Madness</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/lego-indiana-jones-madness/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2008:/3.142</id>
      <published>2008-01-30T17:18:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-01-30T19:51:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>In excitement for the new Indy movie I&#8217;ve bumped Raiders of the Lost Ark to number one on the all time list. Raiders never gets old, never ages, never wears out its welcome. It has always been a spectacularly entertaining movie and I will always love it. (The rest of my list may change, but Raiders will always be in the top three.)
</p>
<p>
To say I am giddy as a schoolgirl about the upcoming Indy movie would be a tremendous understatement. I&#8217;m a gaggle of giddy schoolgirls, twittering every time I see a new poster. So keep that in mind as I gush rapturously over a couple of upcoming Lego Indiana Jones products.
</p>
<p>
Lucasarts, that crazy video game company owned by George Lucas (go figure) can make some really bad, lets make money quick, games (see most of the Star Wars video games.) They&#8217;ve also churned out some of the best games of all time (Sam &#8216;n Max Hit the Road, Day of the Tentacle, Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis etc.) The Lego Star Wars games are fun, cute and easy; in what other game is dying actually kinda fun?
</p>
<p>
With a new Indiana Jones movie on May 22nd 2008 (early in the morning, I&#8217;m sure, like midnight...) Lucasarts is releasing&#8230; <a href="http://www.lucasarts.com/games/legoindianajones/" title="Lego Indiana Jones">Lego Indiana Jones</a>! Woot!
</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/LegoIndy_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="400" height="319" />
</p>
<p>
Also, some scans of the upcoming Indiana Jones Lego sets were released. <span style="color:#c00;">WARNING:</span> SPOILER ALERT! This may give away key plot points!
</p>
<p>
Click through to see.
</p> <p>I&#8217;ll leave the descriptions to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/350473/new-indy-movie-lego-sets-offer-exclusive-peek-into-crystal-skull" title="Gizmodo">Gizmodo</a> (as you can see from the watermark the pictures came from there) so click through if you want to read them. (And while you&#8217;re at it click on some of their advertising for kicks, or maybe watch the clever Apple spot on the homepage.)
</p>
<p>
Indy sword fights with Cate Blanchett! Seriously can you think of anyone you&#8217;d rather see than Cate in an Indy movie? Outside of Marion? Okay and Tom Selleck as Indiana Jones&#8217; brother (how cool the irony!) Other than that, Cate Blanchett!
<br />
<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7624-LEGO-Jungle-Duel_thumb.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7624-LEGO-Jungle-Duel.jpg','popup','width=1039,height=671,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7624-LEGO-Jungle-Duel_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="400" height="256" /></a>
</p>
<p>
Cool CCCP vehicle floats down river while Indy fights bad Ruski&#8217;s.
<br />
<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7625-LEGO-River-Chase_thumb.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7625-LEGO-River-Chase.jpg','popup','width=1039,height=917,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7625-LEGO-River-Chase_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="400" height="352" /></a>
</p>
<p>
Ants&#8230; spiders are creepier, but gotta move on, I guess.
<br />
<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7626-LEGO-Jungle-Critter_thumb.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7626-LEGO-Jungle-Critter.jpg','popup','width=1039,height=561,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7626-LEGO-Jungle-Critter_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="400" height="213" /></a>
</p>
<p>
Mayan/Aztec/Incan? temple. Supposedly in Peru so Incan, but looks Mayan. Go historical accuracy.
<br />
<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7627-LEGO-Temple-of-the-Crystal-Skull_thumb.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7627-LEGO-Temple-of-the-Crystal-Skull.jpg','popup','width=1039,height=763,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/7627-LEGO-Temple-of-the-Crystal-Skull_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="400" height="292" /></a>
</p>
<p>
Oh, and ultimate maybe spoiler. After denying reports that Shia plays Indy&#8217;s son (via Marion) Spielberg and co. are avoiding the subject. Makes sense to me, after all, what would commitment phobic Indy do but leave Marion with a bundle of joy he doesn&#8217;t know about&#8230; 
</p>
<p>
&#8220;I was a child. I was in love. It was wrong and you knew it!&#8221;
</p>
<p>
&#8220;You knew what you were doing.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Indy&#8217;s such a bastard :-D
</p>
<p>
PS You may not have noticed, but I&#8217;ve added a subtle countdown banner to the top of the site.
</p>	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/indiana+jones/" rel="tag">indiana jones</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/indy+hearts+marion/" rel="tag">indy hearts marion</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/lego+indiana+jones/" rel="tag">lego indiana jones</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Midseason TV Report (Slash Which Shows Writers Deserve to Get Paid More)</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/midseason-tv-report-slash-which-shows-writers-deserve-to-get-paid-more/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.141</id>
      <published>2007-12-19T18:32:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-12-19T19:46:40Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>Fall shows are wrapping up their allotment of pre-writers strike episodes and reality shows will be taking over.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s what I liked, and what I didn&#8217;t. In descending order of goodness.
</p>
<p>
<b>The Good:</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>Chuck</b>
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;d need to be a mutant freak to have enough thumbs to rate this one. I love this show. Consitently the best new show of the season. Great cast, funny and fun. Pokes fun at the superspy genre without being condescending. Over the top, but smart. Zachary Levi is perfect as Chuck.
</p>
<p>
<b>Pushing Daisies</b>
</p>
<p>
The pilot was the best episode of TV ever. The rest of the season has been very, very good. Quirky, funny, unique and very very cute. Little bits of extraordinary cleverness makes this a blast to watch.
</p>
<p>
<b>Reaper</b>
</p>
<p>
Way geek cool. I worry a bit about it becoming a demon of the week show, but so far, very good. The pilot was really, really good and while the rest of the season has been below that level it&#8217;s still better than nearly everything else.
</p>
<p>
<b>Dirty Sexy Money</b>
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;m surprised how much fun the show is. Donald Sutherland is fantastic as the patriarch of the Darling family and the show hits the right level of trash and intrigue. Better so far than Desperate Housewives ever was.
</p>
<p>
<b>Samantha Who?</b>
</p>
<p>
Proving that cast is everything this show is mediocre writing and an appealing cast. Christina Applegate is great and aside from her mother (played too broadly by Jean Smart) I like everyone else. Cute as a button pretty much sums up the show.
</p>
<p>
<b>Journeyman</b>
</p>
<p>
Didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d like this much but it&#8217;s pretty good. The most surprising thing for me was when the writers didn&#8217;t manufacture tension by making Kevin McKidd&#8217;s character Dan Vasser lie to his wife about seeing his former fiance in the past. Instead they make him a good father and good husband. Imagine that. The things he does in the past are pretty ordinary but the toll it takes on his family and the interactions in the present work really well.
</p>
<p>
<b>Aliens in Amercia</b>
</p>
<p>
Funny if a bit formulaic. Justin acts like a teenager and does something stupid that alienates him from Raja. At some point he realizes he&#8217;s been an idiot and that getting along with Raja is really important even though Raja&#8217;s extreme goody-goodyness and weird religion makes that hard. Awwwwwwww. But it can be really funny, and you can&#8217;t help but like the kids.
</p>
<p>
<b>Life</b>
</p>
<p>
Haven&#8217;t watched much of this (I&#8217;ve got to draw the line somewhere) but for a cop show it&#8217;s pretty good. Mostly because the lead character is allowed to be unpredictable and kinda funny. Still a procedural cop show, though.
</p>
<p>
<b>The Kinda OK Shows</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>Bionic Woman</b>
</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s OK at times. Not nearly funny enough and takes itself really seriously. They&#8217;ve improved the goofy fast running a bit (mostly by cutting down on the effects) but mostly just kind of plods along. Some bits of fun (such as Battlestar Galactica&#8217;s Katee Sackhoff) but a couple of episodes were plain bad and what was good wasn&#8217;t THAT good. They tried to make an edgy show but didn&#8217;t cast any edgy actors (again Katee Sackhoff would have been FAR better as THE Bionic Woman instead of the OLD Bionic Woman.) As silly as Chuck without the self-awareness that makes it work.
</p>
<p>
<b>Moonlight</b>
</p>
<p>
A vampire show where they took out all the complications of being a vampire. See it&#8217;s all a myth, they&#8217;re super strong and they can walk around in daylight as long as they wear sunglasses and don&#8217;t go too far. Should be darker, should be scarier and they should have worked a bit more on their mythology. It&#8217;s not Angel, it&#8217;s not Buffy it&#8217;s not much of anything.
</p>
<p>
<b>Back To You</b>
</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s not the ratings bonanza Fox hoped, but that&#8217;s probably because it&#8217;s not all that good. Grammar is Frasier and Heaton is annoying. Still like the the young news producer, though.
</p>
<p>
<b>Private Practice</b>
</p>
<p>
Warm, sunny and vapid. Tries to keep up with Grey&#8217;s Anatomy and despite the excellent cast, doesn&#8217;t succeed. Just kinda there, TV. Not bad, not good, just there.
</p>
<p>
<b>The Bad</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>Cavemen</b>
<br />
Really like Nick Kroll and pretty much dislike everything else. Occasionally chuckle worthy but mostly just dumb.
</p>
<p>
<b>The Big Bang Theory</b>
</p>
<p>
Stuart Levine of MSNBC thought this was a <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22287372/" title="highlight">highlight</a>. Whatever. For a show about smart people this one is as dumb as a fence-post. Only sporadically funny and over-broad. Makes fun of dorks without making them people. Gotta have actual characters, show.
</p>
<p>
<b>Carpoolers</b>
</p>
<p>
And I thought The Big Bang Theory was bad. With all the shows that DIDN&#8217;T make it, you&#8217;re telling me that THIS was better than everything else? This show proves that the networks really do have NO idea what they&#8217;re doing. Really, really, REALLY bad. Beyond bad. This is a putrescent pile of poop fermenting in a vat of vomit. I&#8217;m serious. It&#8217;s that bad. When Mr. Levine said The Big Bang Theory was a highlight, he must have watched it right after this. Only in comparison&#8230;
</p>
<p>
Never saw K-Ville, Women&#8217;s Murder Club, Cane, Big Shots, Viva Laughlin etc. I&#8217;ve heard that&#8217;s a good thing.
</p> 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/reviews/" rel="tag">reviews</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/tv/" rel="tag">tv</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Song 03 Lucy&#8217;s On Display</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/song-03-lucys-on-display/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.140</id>
      <published>2007-11-26T19:50:01Z</published>
      <updated>2007-11-26T19:59:07Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>Here is my third song and the first that is NOT any form of lovey-dovey song. Garageband has some pretty awesome clapping crowd noise&#8230; which I left out. Feel free to clap at the end in you mind/out loud to yourself. This is also the first time I&#8217;ve experimented with alternate tunings.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/Lucys_On_Display_(mp3).mp3" title="Lucy's On Display">Lucy&#8217;s On Display</a>
</p> 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/lucys+on+display/" rel="tag">lucy's on display</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/my+songs/" rel="tag">my songs</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Amazon&#8217;s Kindle eBook Reader</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/amazons-kindle-ebook-reader/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.139</id>
      <published>2007-11-19T17:35:01Z</published>
      <updated>2007-11-19T18:31:09Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000FI73MA/ref=pd_sl_aw_manual-1_kindle1_40650458_3" title="Kindle">Kindle</a>, Amazon&#8217;s new eBook reader that will change the world. They hope.
</p>
<p>
Hardly a new idea the Kindle is nevertheless an intriguing one. Initial impressions seem mixed, interestingly it&#8217;s the non-techies that seem to get Bezos&#8217; vision. Most of the gadget geeks seem to fall on the side of meh. Those that use a cell phone only to make calls, a computer only to email and read the newspaper on paper every morning seem most intrigued. This is a device <i>they</i> can get behind.
</p>
<p>
The main innovation of the Kindle is that it is always connected. Like push email on a BlackBerry the Kindle will automatically receive the latest edition of a print newspaper such as The New York Times. Or magazine, or blog post. You can browse and buy books from Amazon&#8217;s web store from anywhere. More exciting is that there isn&#8217;t a monthly fee, at least for the wireless connection. You only pay for what you want, there&#8217;s no service fee or monthly charge. This, in and of itself, is surprising and a huge plus for the device.
</p>
<p>
It uses <a href="http://www.eink.com/" title="eInk">eInk</a> technology, a display technology that uses small particles and electrical magic to display text in a way that has more in common with a paperback than a computer screen. It has no backlight, something that is seen as a good thing, and does not draw power unless the screen is redrawn. This means that it is no more fatiguing than reading a book, something that should appeal to a demographic that does not love LCD and CRT displays.
</p> <p>Much like Apple&#8217;s pushing of the $.99 price for each song Amazon has settled on a $9.99 price for new books, those in hardcover at the bookstore. Older books and classics will be less. Unlike Apple this does seem to be somewhat flexible and books could cost more (or less) depending on the publisher. 
</p>
<p>
Interestingly, at least in some cases, Amazon appears to be <i>losing</i> money on some bestsellers since the publishers refuse to offer it for less than the cost of a printed book. A concept I, and apparently Bezos himself, think is ludicrous. Books are expensive to manufacture and ship, remove the costs of distribution (it apparently only costs $200 to creat an eBook) and the eBook should naturally cost less.
</p>
<p>
What doesn&#8217;t the Kindle have going for it? History, for one. EBook readers have been tried before, Sony currently has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Reader" title="one">one</a> that utilizes the same eInk technology as the Kindle, though most of its books cost at or near list price and it has no wireless connectivity. EBook readers and technology such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Reader" title="Microsoft Reader">Microsoft Reader</a> have not exactly set the world on fire, accounting for only drop-in-the-bucket type sales. At some point, I expect a device to come along that changes this, Amazon obviously hopes that time is now.
</p>
<p>
The Kindle is not cheap. At $399 (shipped, thankfully) it pushes the envelope of affordability. Assuming that each book costs $17.00 (a number I&#8217;m pulling out of the air) you&#8217;d have to buy 57 books to make up the cost of the reader. This begs the question is the convenience worth it? For frequent travelers, train/subway commuters, security &#8220;guards&#8221; and the like I&#8217;m betting yes. For older people the ability to easily change font-size, meaning all books are immediately large print, this could also be a yes. But fear of tech gadgets may and probably will outweigh this for the older generation.
</p>
<p>
Where the Kindle could shine is in the delivery of college textbooks. Big, heavy textbooks lugged around campus are a pain and the cost of each book is sky high. If the textbook publishers are to be believed, textbooks are just expensive to make, all that glossy paper and all. Discounted books available in a portable, easily read format is something I&#8217;m totally behind (plus it would justify the purchase.)
</p>
<p>
Also, in my opinion, the Kindle does not photograph well. When compared to Sony&#8217;s sleek little reader it seems out of date, an anachronism. According to Amazon this is intentional. They did not want a distracting device. The overwhelming design goal was to have the Kindle fade into the background when reading, after all the prettiest cover in the world disappears as soon as the book is open. To be fair, video of the device looks much better and I get the impression that in person it looks much better. It is incredibly thin.
</p>
<p>
What is the final word? We&#8217;ll have to wait and see. Even if the Kindle fails in the beauty department it is backed by Amazon who is first a bookstore. If anyone can do it (and someone will) Amazon can, perhaps not with their first try, but the revolution has started. People may lament the loss of paper books (trees will weep for joy) but eBooks are here to stay, sooner or later.
</p>	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Kevin Prusse vs The Golden Compass</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/kevin-prusse-vs-the-golden-compass/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.138</id>
      <published>2007-11-12T17:51:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-11-12T19:06:09Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>I saw this a couple of days ago as an afterthought in a Salt Lake Tribune article entitled <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_7413516" title="Paul Rolly: Vouchers help all Sudanese Hispanics">Paul Rolly: Vouchers help all Sudanese Hispanics</a>.&nbsp; (Check the very last paragraph, it&#8217;s there.)  That, and a really brief mention on KSL, were it. Kevin Prusse, a principal at Muir Elementary in Bountiful Utah, misused the district email system to warn parents that the movie <a href="http://www.goldencompassmovie.com/" title="The Golden Compass">The Golden Compass</a> is out to get their children.
</p>
<p>
The book the movie is based on is written by an atheist and contains anti-religious themes. Which, according to Prusse (and <a href="http://catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=2007&amp;month=October&amp;read=2322" title="The Catholic League">The Catholic League</a>) means it must be banned.
</p>
<p>
It concerns me that a principal in a public school doesn&#8217;t think about how inappropriate it is to use his position for religious purposes. Even after the fact I doubt he understands it was wrong. The <a href="http://www.ksl.com/index.php/?nid=148&amp;sid=2125422" title="KSL article">KSL article</a> on it mentions that there was only one complaint and several thank-yous which sounds like justification. Just because most of your constituents agree with you (or just don&#8217;t care) does not mean it&#8217;s OK to push your view on others.
</p>
<p>
I expected to see more about this (maybe a real article) but nothing materialized. I assume that this antipathy is a product of the religious climate in Utah and the fact that people just don&#8217;t bother complaining when they should. The Catholic League is perfectly justified in pushing a boycott of this movie, the public school system is not. I plan on seeing this movie (it looks GOOD) and will probably check out the books as well.
</p> 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/bad+religion/" rel="tag">bad religion</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/kevin+prusse/" rel="tag">kevin prusse</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/the+golden+compass/" rel="tag">the golden compass</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Huxley the Dog</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/huxley-the-dog/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.137</id>
      <published>2007-10-30T15:27:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-10-30T15:58:13Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>This is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxley" title="Huxley">Huxley</a> a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bichon_Frisé" title="Bichon Frisé">Bichon Frisé</a> / Poodle mix whom we adopted from the Humane Society last week.
</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/huxleycouch.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="399" height="533" align="center" />
</p>
<p>
He&#8217;s a year and a half old, house-trained and very, very snuggly.&nbsp; This is good until you have to leave at which point he barks hysterically. He never barks otherwise. Unless the doorbell rings (on TV or otherwise.) Or he sees a rabbit&#8230; rabbits are awesome.
</p>
<p>
He&#8217;s a eunuch now, though he doesn&#8217;t know it and will happily try to take over the territory of another dog. He runs into issues proving his manhood when he walks, since he prances like a poodle.
</p>
<p>
He has yet to figure out that he&#8217;s my dog and follows my wife around adoringly. If I walk out the door he looks for my wife.&nbsp; If she walks out the door he sits by it and whimpers softly.
</p>
<p>
He&#8217;ll play fetch but he won&#8217;t give you the ball; you have to take it. He does, however, throw the ball to himself by tossing it backwards over his back.
</p> <p>The name came from a scientist contemporary to Charles Darwin <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxley" title="Thomas Henry Huxley">Thomas Henry Huxley</a>. Huxley was a talented comparative anatomist who was an early and vocal proponent of Darwin&#8217;s theory of evolution earning him the nickname &#8216;Darwin&#8217;s Bulldog.&#8217; Plus this allows me to name my dog Huxley Humes which is awesomely alliterative.
</p>
<p>
Hello Huxley!
</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/huxleygrass.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="399" height="533" align="center" />
<br />

</p>	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/dog/" rel="tag">dog</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/huxley/" rel="tag">huxley</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Don&#8217;t Fear the Reaper</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/dont-fear-the-reaper/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.136</id>
      <published>2007-09-27T05:29:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-27T06:06:16Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>I&#8217;ve got to hurry and post this before I read a review of this show with the same title of this post. Before I plagiarize it.
</p>
<p>
Fall TV is ramping up quickly and has more than the usual complement of good shows (I usually count on maybe two a year.)
</p>
<p>
CW&#8217;s entry into the &#8216;Best Show of the Season&#8217; contest is a little fantasy entitled &#8217;<a href="http://cwtv.com/shows/reaper/" title="Reaper">Reaper</a>.&#8217;  The pilot episode is directed by <a href="http://www.silentbobspeaks.com/" title="Kevin Smith">Kevin Smith</a> (warning, Kevin Smith&#8217;s blog is rather offensive) he of the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120655/" title="Dogma">Dogma</a>, Clerks <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109445/" title="Clerks I">I</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0424345/" title="II">II</a> and other assorted movies fame.&nbsp; Who in the world is better qualified to make fun of the Devil and Hell than Kevin Smith? Nobody!
</p>
<p>
This show is very, very funny. Snort beverages out your nostrils type funny.
</p>
<p>
Sam is a 20 year old slacker. A community college drop-out who excels at exactly nothing. He and his best friend  Bert &#8220;Sock&#8221; Wysocki work (as it were) at the local Work Bench, a Home Depot type hardware store where Sam and Bert are pretty much the worst employees.
</p>
<p>
Sam has a crush on his extra cute co-worker Andi, though he can&#8217;t quite ask her out even though she&#8217;s obviously interested.
</p>
<p>
Never fear though, Sam has a secret (though he doesn&#8217;t know it yet) that&#8217;s cool enough to win the girl as long as she doesn&#8217;t know the details: Sam&#8217;s parents sold his soul to the devil, and on Sam&#8217;s 21st birthday the devil is here to collect.
</p>
<p>
The devil (brilliantly played by Ray Wise) wants Sam to help him out by being Hell&#8217;s bounty hunter &#8220;...not forever, you&#8217;re done when you die, right!&#8221; All Sam has to do is capture souls that have escaped from hell and in return the devil won&#8217;t, well, &#8220;take you&#8217;re mother.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Not entirely perfect (it bogs down a bit when it&#8217;s not trying to be funny) but there&#8217;s more than enough to like in this twisted comedy.
</p>
<p>
Given that the show is on the CW, this might be a good time to get involved because I&#8217;d be willing to bet it&#8217;s going to be around for awhile and that&#8217;s a very good thing.
</p>

 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/cw/" rel="tag">cw</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/fall+tv/" rel="tag">fall tv</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/reaper/" rel="tag">reaper</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>The New About Page</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/the-new-about-page/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.135</id>
      <published>2007-09-27T01:11:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-27T05:14:27Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>I&#8217;ve just updated the about page after a few years of sameness.&nbsp; Turns out I&#8217;ve changed a bit in the intervening time and things should reflect that.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/about-rhinocitynet/" title="About Me">About Me</a>
</p> 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/about+me/" rel="tag">about me</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>I Want To See A Movie Starring &#8216;The Rock&#8217;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/i-want-to-see-a-movie-starring-the-rock/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.134</id>
      <published>2007-09-24T16:47:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-25T15:03:57Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>Ok, Mr. Johnson (and no Casey, even though I know sharing a last name with &#8216;The Rock&#8217; gives you tinglies inside, I don&#8217;t mean you) I&#8217;m interested. Yes, the title of this post is true, there is a movie starring <a href="http://devron.files.wordpress.com/2006/08/rkcvlg_rk-7277r.jpg" title="Dwayne Johnson">Dwayne Johnson</a> that I actually want to see. I know I have made fun of professional wrestling in the past and I know I&#8217;ll make fun of it in the future, I&#8217;m making fun of it right now (look, there goes <a href="http://fredclaus.warnerbros.com/" title="Santa Claus">Santa Claus</a>!) but I&#8217;m serious.
</p>
<p>
Mr. The Rock seems to have fallen into a movie created by <a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&amp;friendID=87279726" title="Richard Kelly">Richard Kelly</a>. Richard created a little (very little) film called <a href="http://www.donniedarkofilm.com/" title="Donnie Darko">Donnie Darko</a>. I have a serious man-crush on the film Donnie Darko (<a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/237115/Donnie-Darko/trailers" title="see the Donnie Darko trailer">see the Donnie Darko trailer</a>) which gives him a free pass to cast whomever he wants in his latest movie. (Yes I know I said man-crush and referenced a film that starred a star of Brokeback Mountain so go ahead, insert offensive gay joke here, haha you&#8217;re funny...)
</p>
<p>
This includes casting Dwayne (...ayne...ayne) &#8216;The Rock&#8217; (...ock...ock) Johnson (...son...son) and Seann William Scott in his movie. He can also cast Mandy Moore and Buffy the Vampire Slayer too for all I care. While he&#8217;s at it, he might as well throw in Justin Timberlake for good measure. (Wait a minute...)
</p>
<p>
He can even name the movie <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809233751/video/4164037/" title="Southland Tales">Southland Tales</a> when there&#8217;s a better name right in his trailer such as, maybe, &#8216;This Is the Way the World Ends.&#8217;
</p>
<p>
In any case, it looks good, click the Southland Tales link above to watch the trailer.
</p>
<p>
P.S. Please avoid the OTHER Dwayne Johnson movie, the one that involves football. Your brain cells will thank you.
</p> 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/donnie+darko/" rel="tag">donnie darko</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/dwayne+johnson/" rel="tag">dwayne johnson</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/richard+kelly/" rel="tag">richard kelly</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/southland+tales/" rel="tag">southland tales</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/the+rock/" rel="tag">the rock</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Two New Sitcoms. One of Them Is Really Bad.</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/two-new-sitcoms-one-of-them-is-really-bad/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.133</id>
      <published>2007-09-22T16:46:01Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-22T16:47:59Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>I watched the premieres of a couple of the freshman fall sitcoms. First, the kinda OK one.
</p>
<p>
<b><a href="http://www.fox.com/backtoyou/" title="Back To You">Back To You</a></b>
</p>
<p>
I love Frasier and I&#8217;m seriously in like with Everybody Loves Raymond, mostly because of Raymond not Patricia Heaton.&nbsp; Back To You is neither of those shows, which is a disappointment though not surprising; the commercials weren&#8217;t all that good.
</p>
<p>
My first thought: &#8220;Look, Frasier&#8217;s on the news.&#8221; I suppose the hazard of playing the same character (even one as great as Frasier) for twenty years is obvious. It&#8217;s hard not to see Frasier whenever Grammar&#8217;s on the screen.&nbsp; He sounds like Frasier, he dispenses advice like Frasier, all he needs is to do to complete the illusion is punctuate his sentences with &#8220;I&#8217;m listening&#8221; and I won&#8217;t be able to get past it.&nbsp; Luckily Frasier is funny and I don&#8217;t mind more of him.
</p>
<p>
My second thought: &#8220;Look, Mrs. Raymond&#8217;s on the news.&#8221; Without Marie across the street, you realize something about Patricia Heaton: she&#8217;s kind of annoying. She&#8217;s not awful, but she&#8217;s not great either.
</p>
<p>
The show itself is rather bland. Easy, obvious jokes, only a couple of which are all that clever. The characters, for the most part, come straight from the &#8216;Sitcom Guide to People That Are Funny&#8217; including &#8216;Slutty Girl&#8217; and &#8216;Guy Who Makes Inappropriate Jokes.&#8217; I&#8217;ll admit to liking <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1265802/" title="Josh Gad's">Josh Gad&#8217;s</a> too young News Director, most of the funny bits involved him.
</p>
<p>
All in all, not horrible, certainly an above average sitcom, but that speaks more to the awful quality of the average sitcom than to the quality of this particular show. 
<br />

</p> <p>Which brings us to:
</p>
<p>
<b><a href="http://alpha.cbs.com/primetime/big_bang_theory/" title="The Big Bang Theory">The Big Bang Theory</a></b>
</p>
<p>
This is a below average sitcom. In fact it&#8217;s downright awful. The big idea behind this show, such as it is, is that dorks/geeks are funny and what could possibly be funnier than sticking socially inept nerds next door to a REALLY PRETTY GIRL. Hahahaha, hilarity!
</p>
<p>
Note to show: successful shows have characters you care about. All of the jokes here are at the expense of the main characters, if you laugh at them you laugh at the main characters, definitely not with them. Really, though, you won&#8217;t be laughing; it&#8217;s not funny. If you find yourself laughing during the show, it won&#8217;t be the shows fault. Maybe someone around you made fun of the show&#8217;s writers, maybe a clown walked into your living room, maybe the show was interrupted by the latest presidential address, I don&#8217;t know. What you won&#8217;t be doing is laughing at the jokes, though you might feel like whimpering softly to yourself.
</p>
<p>
My favorite part, if I can say anything was my favorite, was the staircase. It had the magic property of being exactly as long as was necessary to finish the conversation. Obviously the same set, repeated with slightly different decorations until the dorks finished their last sentence. Look, door without caution tape, now the door has caution tape, now it doesn&#8217;t&#8230; Caution tape? Oh, I forgot, I&#8217;m pretty sure the apartment building where everybody lives is supposed to be run-down and maybe full of crack-heads. How do I know, well, there&#8217;s caution tape on doors sometimes.
</p>
<p>
Seriously, don&#8217;t watch this show. There&#8217;s only so many IQ points floating around the world and it&#8217;s not worth losing some to these geeks.
</p>
	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/back+to+you/" rel="tag">back to you</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/fall+tv/" rel="tag">fall tv</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/the+big+bang+theory/" rel="tag">the big bang theory</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Pushing Daisies on ABC</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/pushing-daisies-on-abc/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.132</id>
      <published>2007-09-18T15:52:01Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-19T01:04:45Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p><img src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/230px-Pushing_Daisies_logo.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="230" height="170" class="center" />
<br />
I found out that the pilot episode of the new ABC series <a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/pushingdaisies/" title="Pushing Daisies">Pushing Daisies</a> was in the wild (read torrented) and given my frenzied anticipation, immediately downloaded it.&nbsp; And I&#8217;m glad I did, though watching it early just means I have to wait a week longer to find out what happens next. This is my kind of show. It&#8217;s quirky, funny, well written and visually arresting.&nbsp; The dialogue is fast, think Gillmore Girls only it doesn&#8217;t wear out its welcome (or rather, think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonderfalls" title="Wonderfalls">Wonderfalls</a>, but I doubt you&#8217;ve seen that.)
</p>
<p>
The story centers around a young man, Ned the piemaker, who has a gift, not given to him by anyone in particular, where he can bring someone (or thing) to life merely by touching them. The problem being that if he touches them again they die instantly, never to revive.&nbsp; And if he doesn&#8217;t touch them within one minute, someone else dies taking their place &#8220;it&#8217;s a random proximity thing,&#8221; he explains.
</p>
<p>
Ned makes pies for a living (being able to bring wilted strawberries back to life comes in handy for this) though he supplements his income with the reward money from solving murders.&nbsp; Turns out that the easiest way to solve a murder is to ask the victim who killed them!
</p>
 <p>The show twists around the Ross/Rachel, Jim/Pam will they or won&#8217;t they bit quite brilliantly when Ned&#8217;s childhood sweetheart Chuck is murdered on a cruise ship.&nbsp; There&#8217;s reward money involved so Ned resurrects her to ask the usual questions but is unable to bring himself to end it before the minute is up.&nbsp; Of course this means that the random proximity things happens, killing the man in the bathroom nearby. 
</p>
<p>
&#8220;He was a very, very bad man, he stole stuff off dead people and sold it on the internet&#8221; explains Ned to the business partner in murder-solving. 
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Oh that&#8217;s very nice, the fact that he was a very, very bad man make you feel better about what you did?&#8221;
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Yes, immensely!&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Now, however, there&#8217;s a problem, Ned and Chuck are desperately in love, so the question isn&#8217;t really will they get together&#8230; it&#8217;s how in the world can they.&nbsp; If he touches her, she dies. Which means the show gets to be very clever in how it advances their short-distance relationship.
</p>
<p>
The pilot episode was directed by Barry Sonnenfeld and is just as quirky as that would suggest.&nbsp; It deals with dark and somewhat disturbing things, all while maintaining a light-hearted attitude to it and a bright palette of colors to offset it. The stars are immensely appealing and have genuine chemistry together.
</p>
<p>
The show premieres October 4th on ABC and more than deserves an audience. The pilot was very, very good (best pilot since Lost and the show may be better...) Watch it, I&#8217;d hate for it to die an early and undeserved death.
</p>	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/new+shows/" rel="tag">new shows</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/pushing+daisies/" rel="tag">pushing daisies</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>The Jesus Phone Is Here</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/the-jesus-phone-is-here/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.131</id>
      <published>2007-09-16T14:39:01Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-16T15:56:28Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p><a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/jesus_phone-2.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/jesus_phone-2.jpg','popup','width=493,height=493,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img style="border-width: 0; border-color: #000000; border-style: none" src="http://www.rhinocity.net/images/uploads/jesus_phone-2_thumb.jpg" alt="image" width="80" height="80" align="left" /></a> Yes, it is true. To the surprise of absolutely no-one I have purchased The King of Phones, The Son of Jobs, the (angels singing) iPhone. The <a href="http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=55136" title="iPhone Price Drop">price drop</a> was too much. Two months, $200 how could I resist. I could sell my old phone, sell my old ipod on <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a> (oh eBay, what would I do without you and your legions of willing buyers!) and I&#8217;m pretty close to the cost.
</p>
<p>
It looks very cool on TV, I wanted it, but not that bad (meaning as long as I bit my tongue hard enough I could resist flying out the door to buy it.) Then I saw one in person. Oh my. Oh my. Geez&#8230; I&#8217;m a sucker for gadgets and this was such a gadget. You may have read complaints about it, people finding one thing or another that wasn&#8217;t quite right, and they&#8217;re true. It is definitely a flawed device. But only in context of what might have been.
</p> <p>It is, without question, the best phone I have ever seen. Solid, curvy, smooth, a slick tech device that is booth oooo and ahhhhh worthy. Ooooo and ahhhhh. It is smaller than I expected, but solid for it&#8217;s size. The interface is fast and flashy. Lots of zooming and sliding that is fancier than any portable device I&#8217;ve ever seen.
</p>
<p>
<b>A few complaints</b> 
</p>
<p>
Mind you this is in context of the iphone only, things that could be improved. It is still better than any other phone, it just sets its own standard way high.
</p>
<p>
First, the headphone jack. You need an adapter to use regular headphones. It&#8217;s recessed a bit in the top and, while the jack itself is normal, most headphones don&#8217;t fit into the little hole it&#8217;s placed in. I don&#8217;t get it either.
<br />
Second, while it feels awesome, it&#8217;s slippery, the brushed aluminum is not grippy at all. It feels like you&#8217;re always about to drop it. I don&#8217;t like that feeling. Easy enough to fix, and you&#8217;ll want to anyway to protect the surface from painful scratches. <a href="http://www.bestskinsever.com">Best Skins Ever</a>
</p>
<p>
It doesn&#8217;t support WPA Enterprise. Which is <i>what</i> you ask? Well, it&#8217;s a wireless standard that is used in environments where lots of users have access and giving everyone a username and password makes sense. Like, say, a university campus. Say, the <a href="http://www.utah.edu">University of Utah</a> campus. Which means I can&#8217;t log into the regular wifi network at school. Easy enough to fix with a firmware update so get to it Apple!
</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s only on AT&amp;T&#8230; ok that&#8217;s not a big problem, just <a href="http://www.hackint0sh.org">hack</a> it! (Already done, hello T-Mobile, thank you geek community.)
</p>
<p>
You can&#8217;t install third party programs. Oh, but you can, see &#8216;hack&#8217; link in previous paragraph.
</p>
<p>
It is somewhat harder to type on the screen than with a physical keyboard. It&#8217;s not that bad, just remember that it registers when your finger leaves the screen so you can slide your finger to get to the letter. Also it has some sort of delay in registering so if you accidentally slip your finger off the letter it still types the right letter. Plus it predicts fairly well what you meant even if you completely mistype the letters.{pagebreak}
</p>
<p>
<b>Now things I like.</b>
</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s beautiful. Seriously. Which is par for the course for Apple lately.
<br />
The volume buttons on the side. Love it.
</p>
<p>
Coupled with the silence switch, no messing around with menus to turn the ringer off. Just flick a switch. Genius.
</p>
<p>
The web browser. I have used lots of portable web browsers and the ALL suck. Safari on the iPhone doesn&#8217;t. People complain about flash non-support, but seriously people&#8230; try ANY OTHER PORTABLE WEB BROWSER. This one is brilliant. One thing you don&#8217;t get from watching the commercials that is awesome is the zoom. Double tap to zoom in, but it doesn&#8217;t just zoom all the way in like I expected. It zooms to fit the width of whatever box you tapped in.
</p>
<p>
The iPod part truely is the best iPod ever. It&#8217;s loads of fun to play with and zoom through coverflow and from track to track. The album art is awesome.
</p>
<p>
I can live without youtube, but you can also watch quicktime videos off the web, such as movie trailers on <a href="http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/">apple.com</a>
</p>
<p>
The interface is really quick. And zoomy. You&#8217;ve got to try it, it really does work like the commercials.
</p>
<p>
Google Maps is freaking awesome. Better than the online version seriously, and you can dial and find business and and and&#8230; it&#8217;s sweet.{pagebreak}
<br />
<b>Summary:</b>
<br />
 
</p>
<p>
Bad:
</p>
<ul>
<li>Headphone Jack</li>
<li>Slippery</li>
<li>No WPA Enterprise</li>
<li>Minor keyboard issues</li>
<li>Only on AT&amp;T unless you&#8217;re sneaky</li>
<li>Cannot add multi-day repeats (such as every week on MWF) to calendar entry (but CAN for the alarm clock!)</li>
<li>Doesn&#8217;t have <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodclassic/">160 GB</a></li>
</ul>
<br />
 

<p>
Awesome:
</p>
<ul>
<li>iPod portion</li>
<li>Volume switch and silence switch</li>
<li>Mobile Safari kicks trash</li>
<li>Widescreen video</li>
<li>Flicking, double tapping on things is WAY fun.</li>
<li>Email app rocks</li>
<li>Google Maps is&#8230; awesome.</li>
<li>Apple Trailers</li>
<li>Awesome alarm clock</li>
<li>The little talk bubbles in the SMS app are fun.</li>
<li>The iPhone theme song is catchy (I hear it my head whenever I use it!)</li>
</ul>
<br />
 

<p>
Trust me&#8230; It&#8217;s awesome.
</p>	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/apple/" rel="tag">apple</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/blasphemy/" rel="tag">blasphemy</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/iphone/" rel="tag">iphone</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/jesus+phone/" rel="tag">jesus phone</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Monopoly for Really Dumb People</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/monopoly-for-really-dumb-people/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.130</id>
      <published>2007-09-14T15:48:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-19T15:51:58Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>I had this pointed out to me the other day. &nbsp;Parker Brothers has updated the ever-popular Monopoly game so that even really, really dumb people can play. &nbsp;The assumption, I guess, is that nearly everybody now has at least one copy of Monopoly (we have three for some reason) leaving only one market left untapped; people who failed first-grade mathematics. &nbsp;<a href="#mce_temp_url#">Introducing&nbsp;Monopoly for Really Dumb People</a>&nbsp;an edition designed to take all power of thought away from you, the player so you can focus on moving your&nbsp;top-hat&nbsp;(or the ultra-modern Segway?!?) playing piece.</p><p>Ok, I get that this is an attempt to update this game to work electronically but come on, how hard is it to add $100 + $100? &nbsp;How are you supposed to slip that extra $500 under your seat so no one knows how much money you actually have? &nbsp;Where&#8217;s the fun in that? &nbsp;Where&#8217;s the benefit to being the banker if you don&#8217;t get to skim a little bit off the top each time you pass Go?</p><p>Legions of kids learned how to do simple math in their heads by buying Park Place while watching someone else buy Broadway. &nbsp;Now we can teach them how to use a calculator as soon as they can punch the buttons and we won&#8217;t need addition anymore.</p><p>What I really can&#8217;t wait for is for a totally cashless society so I can buy a Monopoly that simply scans the barcode&nbsp;tattooed on my forehead. &nbsp;That would be easy.</p><p>[Edit: My wife pointed this out to me, so credit where credit is due.]
</p> 	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/monopoly/" rel="tag">monopoly</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/plastic+fantastic/" rel="tag">plastic fantastic</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/stupid+people/" rel="tag">stupid people</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Exploding Child and the Rules of Parenting</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhinocity.net/rhinocity/single/exploding-child-and-the-rules-of-parenting/" />
      <id>tag:rhinocity.net,2007:/3.129</id>
      <published>2007-09-04T17:58:00Z</published>
      <updated>2007-09-04T18:42:13Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ryan</name>
            <email>kifwalu@gmail.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Personal"
        scheme="http://www.rhinocity.net/index/s/personal/"
        label="Personal" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
      <p>I forgot the cardinal rule of parenting last night. &nbsp;If your child says &quot;I need to...&quot; followed by a description of any body function, particularly those that involve fluids and chunks, quickly throw them into the nearest bathroom. &nbsp;There is no negotiating. &nbsp;You cannot delay, wheedle, plead or reason with said child.</p><p>The bathroom door was locked, my child said he thought he needed to throw up. &nbsp;I said (why, why, why!) &#8216;you&#8217;re fine, lets go downstairs.&#8217; (Why, why, why!) If I were reasonable I would have done the only sane thing: kick in the bathroom door and chuck my child in the direction of the toilet before he could up-chuck on me. I chose the insane thing instead and we went downstairs.&nbsp;
</p> <p>Three steps across the living room he looked up at me, startled, and said two, haunting words: &#8216;It&#8217;s coming.&#8217; &nbsp;He then exploded, spewing his gooey insides into a horror-movie mess on the floor. &nbsp;I stared, in shock, at the mess while my son&#8217;s outer shell collapsed on the floor like dropped laundry. &nbsp;I kicked his boneless skin to the side and&#8230; ok, I&#8217;m scaring myself, he was fine, but he looked no less shocked than I.</p><p>He looked up at me. I looked down at him. &nbsp;He looked at me. &nbsp;I looked at him ...I looked at him again. Then we turned and looked back at the floor. &nbsp;I put my hand on his shoulder and said &quot;go take a shower bud.&quot; Nothing else could be said.</p><p>It was stunning. He&#8217;s not big enough to have all that in his stomach. I&#8217;m fairly certain that at least three laws of physics were broken last night, not the least of which being that a container that is only yay big can only hold yay much chunks.</p><p>To be fair he mistook a stomach ache for hunger pains (why? have a six year old, you&#8217;ll stop asking why, it never makes sense.) So he just kept eating, saying he was hungry when what he meant was &#8216;I&#8217;m sick.&#8217;</p><p>I&#8217;ve decided to simply stop feeding him, it&#8217;s safer that way.</p><p>(What? I have to feed him? Aww crap, fine&#8230; here&#8217;s a corn-dog.)
</p>	
<h4 class="margins">Tagged:</h4>

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/children/" rel="tag">children</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/gross/" rel="tag">gross</a>, 

<a href="http://www.rhinocity.net/search/tag/projectile+vomiting/" rel="tag">projectile vomiting</a>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>